CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/AUnknown· 1,700 enrolled
Drug / intervention
FFR-guided stenting +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02673424
NCT02673424N/AUnknown

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Imaging and Physiology-guided Intervention Strategy in Patients With Intermediate Stenosis: Fractional FLow Reserve And IVUS for Clinical OUtcomes in Patients With InteRmediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR)

Seoul National University Hospital·interventional·Posted Feb 3, 2016·Updated Feb 10, 2025

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating FFR-guided stenting and IVUS-guided stenting for Stable Angina. Targeting 1,700 participants across 5 sites in 2 countries.

Detailed Summary

To compare the safety and efficacy of FFR (fractional flow reserve)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy with IVUS (intravascular ultrasound \[IVUS\])-guided PCI in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis.

Study Details

Timeline

N/AUnknownOverdue
20162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedFeb 3, 2016
Enrollment StartJun 1, 2016
Primary CompletionFeb 1, 2025
Study CompletionDec 1, 2025
TodayJul 1, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 8.7 yearsPosted 10.4 years ago

Interventions

FFR-guided stentingprocedure

The percutaneous coronaryintervention using drug-eluting stent will be indicated according to following criteria in the FFR-guided strategy arm \* Criteria for revascularization: The FFR ≤ 0.80 will be targeted for PCI

IVUS-guided stentingprocedure

The percutaneous coronaryintervention using drug-eluting stent will be indicated according to following criteria in the IVUS-guided strategy arm \* Criteria for revascularization: Minimum lumen area (MLA) ≤ 3mm2 or (MLA ≤ 4mm2 AND Plaque burden \>70%)