At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Imaging and Physiology-guided Intervention Strategy in Patients With Intermediate Stenosis: Fractional FLow Reserve And IVUS for Clinical OUtcomes in Patients With InteRmediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR)
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating FFR-guided stenting and IVUS-guided stenting for Stable Angina. Targeting 1,700 participants across 5 sites in 2 countries.
Detailed Summary
To compare the safety and efficacy of FFR (fractional flow reserve)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy with IVUS (intravascular ultrasound \[IVUS\])-guided PCI in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
The percutaneous coronaryintervention using drug-eluting stent will be indicated according to following criteria in the FFR-guided strategy arm \* Criteria for revascularization: The FFR ≤ 0.80 will be targeted for PCI
The percutaneous coronaryintervention using drug-eluting stent will be indicated according to following criteria in the IVUS-guided strategy arm \* Criteria for revascularization: Minimum lumen area (MLA) ≤ 3mm2 or (MLA ≤ 4mm2 AND Plaque burden \>70%)