CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 114 enrolled
Drug / intervention
lung protective ventilation +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02680925
NCT02680925N/ACompleted

The Influence of Lung Protective Ventilation During Pulmonary Lobectomy on Clinical Outcome in Pediatric Patients

Seoul National University Hospital·interventional·Posted Feb 12, 2016·Updated Mar 7, 2018

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating lung protective ventilation and Conventional ventilation for Pulmonary Complication. Completed, enrolled 114 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The investigator will evaluate the influence of lung protective ventilation on postoperative clinical outcome in pediatric patients. The hypothesis is that application of low tidal volume, intermittent alveolar recruitment and adequate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) would be more beneficial than conventional ventilation in children.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesSouth Korea
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedFeb 12, 2016
Enrollment StartFeb 1, 2016
Primary CompletionFeb 1, 2018
TodayJul 1, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2 yearsPosted 10.4 years ago

Interventions

lung protective ventilationprocedure

TV 4 ml/kg during one lung ventilation and 6 ml/kg during two-lung ventilation with PEEP of 6 cmH2O

Conventional ventilationprocedure

TV 8 ml/kg during one lung ventilation and 10 ml/kg during two-lung ventilation without PEEP