CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 200 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Not specified
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03768102
NCT03768102N/ACompleted

Comparative Study of Verbal Rating Scale and Numerical Rating Scale in Post Anesthesia Care Unit

Seoul National University Hospital·observational·Posted Dec 7, 2018·Updated Oct 22, 2020

In Brief

An observational study for Pain Measurement and 2 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 200 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

In the postanesthetic care unit(PACU), patients who are recovering from anesthesia are not easy to communicate with. Accordingly, accurate evaluation of acute surgical pain is difficult for PACU patients in spite of severe postoperative pain. Therefore, pain evaluation is clinically important and challenging in PACU. The pain evaluation tool should be simple and easy to understand for accurate assessment. Among the most commonly used pain assessment methods are numerical rating scale(NRS), visual analogue scale(VAS) and verbal rating scale(VRS). These three methods have proved valid for clinical situations in many studies. VRS appears to be easier to understand than the other two methods for patients in PACU. The purpose of this study is to compare NRS and VRS in PACU patients.

Study Details

Study Typeobservational
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesSouth Korea
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedDec 7, 2018
Enrollment StartDec 12, 2018
Primary CompletionAug 30, 2019
TodayJul 1, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 9 monthsPosted 7.6 years ago