CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/AUnknown· 230 target
Drug / intervention
lower pressure +1 morebehavioral
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT04494802
NCT04494802N/AUnknown
CompareCT.gov

The Influence of LMA Cuff Pressure on Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Gastric Insufflation Assessed by Ultrasound in Pediatric Patients

Seoul National University Hospital·interventional·Posted Jul 31, 2020·Updated Aug 4, 2020

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating lower pressure and higher pressure for Aspiration. Targeting 230 participants.

Detailed Summary

Cuff inflation up to the maximum cuff pressure when using LMA flexible can cause sore throat and discomfort after the surgery, and if the surgery is unexpectedly prolonged, there can be a side effect that can cause ischemic damage around the neck. If keeping cuff pressure low will not increase gastric insufflation and there is no change in other outcome variables, keeping it low may have a positive effect on anesthesia management and outcome in children.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsAspiration
Countries--
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/AUnknownOverdue
202120222023202420252026
First PostedJul 31, 2020
Enrollment StartAug 10, 2020
Primary CompletionAug 10, 2021
TodayJul 1, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1 yearPosted 5.9 years ago

Interventions

lower pressurebehavioral

During the operation, cuff pressure of LMA flexible is maintained to 30cmH2O

higher pressurebehavioral

During the operation, cuff pressure of LMA flexible is maintained to 50cmH2O