At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Randomized Clinical Trial of Tele-Surveillance and Remote Symptom Monitoring Compared to Standard Surveillance for HPV-Associated Oropharynx Cancer With No Evidence of Disease on Post-Treatment Imaging
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Standard surveillance, Telemedicine surveillance (tele-surveillance), and 1 other intervention for Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Active but no longer recruiting, targeting 40 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare standard surveillance with telemedicine surveillance (tele-surveillance) and find out which surveillance approach is best for people with HPV-associated head and neck cancer who have no evidence of disease after treatment. The researches will look at how the two approaches affect participants' quality of life, health outcomes, and expenses (for example, costs of routine visits and procedures). They will also determine doctors' and patients' satisfaction with tele-surveillance.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Participant coming to the clinic for in-person follow-up visits and having routine endoscopy and cancer imaging procedures as needed
The tele-surveillance visit occurs annually after completion of therapy and consists of a phone call with or without video conferencing between the patient and the treatment team (physician, nurse, and/ or nurse practitioner). The use of video conferencing is strongly encouraged. Clinic visits, endoscopies, and imaging studies can be performed at the discretion of the treatment team for concerning patient symptoms.
EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-HN43 at 12 and 24 months, FACE-Questionnaire Module, Telehealth Usability Questionnaire, Telehealth Usability Questionnaire, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Treatment Satisfaction -Patient Satisfaction inventory