At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Single Center, Prospective Study to Compare the Quality and Quantity of the Cellular Content of M-PRP Harvested After Peripheral Mobilization of Progenitor Cells Using Filgrastim Versus Pegfilgrastim
In Brief
An observational study evaluating Filgrastim and Pegfilgrastim for Healthy. Completed, enrolled 15 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The goal of this prospective, observational study is to compare the quality and quantity of the cellular content of platelet-rich plasma harvested after administering one of two cell-stimulating proteins, filgrastim and pegfilgrastim. The main question it aims to answer is: • Will participants have a similar cellular content when comparing a 4-day filgrastim treatment to a one-day pegfilgrastim treatment? Participants will have the following intervention administered: * 130mL of blood will be drawn on the first visit after consent and in followup visits after administering treatment (4 days for filgrastim, 7 days for pegfilgrastim) * Half of all participants will receive filgrastim first, followed by pegfilgrastim 8 weeks after filgrastim treatment concludes. The other half will receive the treatments in reverse order Researchers will compare the quality and quantity of cell content after each treatment administration as well as comparing differences in data dependent on which order treatment was given.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) protein obtained from the bacterial fermentation of a strain of E. coli. transformed with a genetically engineered plasmid containing the human G-CSF gene; administered via syringe
long-acting covalent conjugate of recombinant methionyl human filgrastim and monomethoxypolyethylene glycol (PEG); administered via syringe