CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/AEnrolling by Invitation· 240 target
Drug / intervention
Stimulus Properties: Target Location +2 moreother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT06852521
NCT06852521N/AEnrolling by InvitationOn TrackUpdated 2mo ago

Probing the Role of Feature Dimension Maps in Visual Cognition: Expt 3.1 (Pilot)

University of California, Santa Barbara·interventional·Posted Feb 28, 2025·Updated Apr 22, 2026

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Stimulus Properties: Target Location, Stimulus Properties: Distractor Presence, and 1 other intervention for Basic Science: Visual Attention in Healthy Participants and Attention. Currently enrolling by invitation, targeting 240 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

How do we know what's important to look at in the environment? Sometimes, we need to look at objects because they are 'salient' (for example, bright flashing lights of a police car, or the stripes of a venomous animal), while other times, we need to ignore irrelevant salient locations and focus only on locations we know to be 'relevant'. These behaviors are often explained by the use of 'priority maps' which index the relative importance of different locations in the visual environment based on both their salience and relevance. In this research, we aim to understand how these factors interact when determining what's important to look at. Specifically, we are evaluating the extent to which the visual system considers locations that are known to be irrelevant when considering the salience of objects. We're testing the hypothesis that the visual system always computes maps of salient locations within 'feature maps', but that activity from these maps is not read out to guide behavior for task-irrelevant locations. We'll have people look at displays containing colored shapes and/or moving dots and report aspects of the visual stimulus (e.g., orientation of a line within a particular stimulus). We'll measure response times across conditions in which we manipulate the presence/absence of salient distracting stimuli and provide various kinds of cues about the potential relevance of different locations on the screen. The rationale is that by measuring changes in visual search behavior (and thus inferring computations performed on brain representations), we will determine how these aspects of simplified visual environments impact the brain's representation of important object locations. This will support future studies using brain imaging techniques aimed at identifying the neural mechanisms supporting the extraction of salient and relevant locations from visual scenes, which can inform future diagnosis/treatment of disorders which can impact our ability to perform visual search (e.g., schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease).

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States

Timeline

N/AEnrolling by Invitation
202520262027
First PostedFeb 28, 2025
Enrollment StartFeb 6, 2025
Primary CompletionFeb 1, 2027
TodayJul 1, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2.0 yearsPosted 1.3 years agoPrimary completion in 7 months

Interventions

Stimulus Properties: Target Locationother

The location of the target item in the display will be varied across trials (appear left, right, up, or down)

Stimulus Properties: Distractor Presenceother

A proportion of all trials will contain a task-irrelevant, singleton distractor defined in a non-target dimension (e.g., color target and motion distractor)

Stimulus properties: Cue Validityother

Varied across trials, the validity of the cue will be determined by the match or mismatch between direction of the visual cue (an arrowhead around the fixation pointing to the right, left, up, or down) and actual target location