CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ARecruiting· 68,649 target
Drug / intervention
Blood, nasopharyngeal swab and saliva +3 morebiological
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT06870435
NCT06870435N/ARecruitingMonitorUpdated 15mo ago · Completion was 5mo ago
Slow Enrollment
Monitor

Comparison and Strategy Optimization of Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) DNA and BNLF2b Total Antibodies (P85-Ab) with VCA-IgA and EBNA1-IgA for Screening Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in High-risk Areas

Ming-Yuan Chen·interventional·Posted Mar 11, 2025·Updated Mar 11, 2025

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Blood, nasopharyngeal swab and saliva, EBNA1-IgA, VCA-IgA, P85-Ab and EBV DNA, and 2 other interventions for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC) and 2 related conditions. Currently recruiting, targeting 68,649 participants across 1 site.

Signals

Enrolling slower than its timeline implies

Detailed Summary

This study is a prospective, self-controlled, multicenter clinical trial. All participants will be tested for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated biomarkers, including the two-antibody method (VCA-IgA and EBNA1-IgA), BNLF2b total antibodies (P85-Ab), and plasma EBV DNA. Furthermore, novel screening biomarkers, such as next-generation sequencing for EBV and castoff cells using nasopharyngeal swabs, will be explored. First, it aims to investigate whether plasma EBV DNA testing or the P85-Ab testing can achieve higher sensitivity than the current standard two-antibody method testing while maintaining specificity in NPC screening, thereby identifying the optimal initial NPC screening strategy. Based on the determined optimal initial screening strategy, the study will validate the proposed two-step method (subjects first undergo two-antibody method testing and P85-Ab testing; those positive for either one biomarker above proceed to plasma EBV DNA testing; subjects positive in both steps are defined as high-risk and receive endoscopic examinations with or without biopsy) compared with the single-step method (subjects simultaneously undergo two-antibody method testing, P85-Ab testing, and plasma EBV DNA testing; subjects with any positive biomarker undergo endoscopic examinations with or without biopsy) and each single screening testing. The aim is to determine whether two-step method can further improve the positive predictive value (PPV) while maintaining non-inferior sensitivity, thereby enhancing screening efficiency, reducing the rate of invasive procedures (such as endoscopic biopsies), and lowering medical costs and insurance burdens.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesChina
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ARecruiting
202520262027202820292030203120322033203420352036
First PostedMar 11, 2025
Enrollment StartJan 24, 2025
Primary CompletionJan 23, 2026
Study CompletionDec 31, 2035
TodayJul 1, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 12 monthsPosted 1.3 years ago

Interventions

Blood, nasopharyngeal swab and salivabiological

Collect blood, nasopharyngeal swab and saliva samples from participants.

EBNA1-IgA, VCA-IgA, P85-Ab and EBV DNAother

Detect EBNA1-IgA, VCA-IgA, P85-Ab and EBV DNA for all participants.

Novel screening biomarkersother

Next-generation sequencing for EBV and castoff cells using nasopharyngeal swabs, etc..

Endoscopic examinations with or without biopsyother

High-risk participants will refer to endoscopic examinations with or without biopsy