At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Venetoclax+Decitabine+Busulfan+Fludarabine (VEN+DAC+Bu2Flu4) vs Busulfan+Fludarabine Conditioning Regimen (Bu2Flu5 ) for Older Patients With Myeloid Malignancies Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (Allo-HSCT)
In Brief
A Phase 3 clinical trial evaluating Venetoclax (VEN), Decitabine (DAC), and 2 other interventions for Older Patients and 3 related conditions. Not yet recruiting, targeting 160 participants.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of venetoclax+decitabine+busulfan+fludarabine (VEN+DAC+Bu2Flu4) regimen with busulfan+fludarabine (Bu2Flu5) regimen in older patients with myeloid malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Venetoclax (VEN) was administered at 400mg/day on days -10 to -4.
Decitabine (DAC) was administered at 20mg/m2/day on days -10 to -8.
Busulfan (Bu) was administered at 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -5 to -4.
Fludarabine (Flu) was administered at 30mg/m2/day on days -5 to -2.
Fludarabine (Flu) was administered at 30mg/m2/day on days -6 to -2.